Only me. That’s what he says; it could only happen to me. What’d I do this time, you ask? Well, I broke the toilet didn’t I!
It wasn’t easy you know. The way it happened was one of those 1-in-a-million strokes of ill fortune—or bad coordination, or just plain old bad luck. I was cleaning the window shelf in the bathroom and knocked over a bottle of witch hazel. It fell over, rolled off the shelf, and flew through the air… landing right in the toilet. I saw bits of glass fly and thought, “Oh damn, the bottle’s broken, that’s going to be yucky to clean up.” But, the bottle wasn’t broken—the toilet was. There was a great big hole in the front of the loo—not a crack, a hole.
Of course I had to phone “the man” and see what he wanted me to do. We only have one toilet, so it’s not like I could call the insurance people and wait for them to come out, access, and decide if/when to replace the thing. And, it’s not like I could phone a plumber to come and sort it out. I don’t have much money right now—just £50 I was saving for something special and my overdraft—so buying a replacement toilet was going to be an ordeal; getting someone in to install it was out of the question. So, I phoned the man.
He was quiet; didn’t say much. He didn’t want to discuss it; he was at work. “Wait until I get home,” he said. My stomach began to churn—not exactly a good thing, given the situation….
Coming home time was several hours away, so while I waited, I tried to make myself useful. I fished out the insurance documents, just in case we needed them. In an imitation of Millionaire, I phoned a friend to ask the questions for which I had no answer (she didn’t either unfortunately). I googled “toilets” to see if I could locate an affordable, yet decent-looking replacement. I was really surprised to discover how much a loo costs; who’d have imagined that a toilet seat can cost more than an iPhone. .. It’s just weird. I also googled “how to fit a toilet” and realised there is a reason they put “we highly recommend a professional plumber install” on toilet adverts. And I waited. And he finally came home.
Understand that my husband is high-stress and more than a little passive aggressive. He is also intolerant of accidents and mistakes; especially those that he didn’t make but he has to sort. So, seeing as how this was my third accident in six months, his reaction was less than pleasant. But, I stayed quiet and let him have a go. I also did my best to try to help fix the situation. I made him take me with him toilet shopping. I paid for it (thank goodness for the overdraft) when we found one. I (carefully) unpacked it and got it ready for installation. I was Johnny-on-the-spot with every request he made while he installed it. I even volunteered a few times to do some of the work; but snide responses made me very aware my main job was that of whipping boy. So, I took the verbal beaten with appropriate remorse; which, in hindsight, was exactly what he needed from me most.
Shopping for it took three hours; installing it took three hours—so, a long evening, but not nearly as long as it might have been. My husband is very talented when it comes to DIY sorts of things; we are very lucky for that. He’s not a plumber, but I can’t imagine a plumber doing any better. Adjustments had to be made of course—it wasn’t a swap of like-kind loos—but, despite his proclaiming at every obstacle that “it can’t be done”, he managed a viable solution for every problem. The new loo was installed; it flushes and nothing leaks. And it looks nice; better than the old one even. Of course, I’m almost too scared to use it…
I’m not sure why I’ve been on this trend of breaking and losing things; making loads of mistakes one after another. Maybe it’s to learn… or maybe I’m just cursed! Whatever the case, yesterday I broke the loo. And, more importantly, yesterday—with a whole lot of help— I made it okay again. We all make mistakes; it’s what we do with them once we’ve made them that counts.
Bright Blessings,
Jake

The Drowning of the Rope Weaver: A Social Commentary
14 January 2010 in 1, Social Commentary, Thoughts & Musings | Tags: contribution, Great Britain, socialism, society | 7 comments
This morning, as I was listening to the news, I found myself in an interesting frame of mine. Every time someone said: “We want the government to do more.” Or “We want to know what the government is going to do about it.” Or “We have appealed to the government to step up to the plate”, the inside of my head screamed; “Please, no… I can do no more! I’m weaving as fast as I can, yet I am drifting out to sea. Not because I can’t weave enough; but because you take from me more than I can spare.”
The humble path of the rope weaver
Imagine your life as being lived in a boat. Your goal is to set anchor in a place capable of providing you with what you need and hopefully a few extras to make life nice. Your earnings are the rope that tethers your boat to that anchor. You are the rope weaver; and your life is dedicated to weaving a rope that will insure that your boat and its passengers remain safely tethered to the solid sea floor. You see the tide; you’ve seen what it can do. So you weave—in the hopes that you will always have enough to keep you from being crushed in the shipping lanes or drowned in the open sea. You are the humble rope weaver. And you are proud.
But not all weavers are created equal
While in every society, there are some more-reckless weavers who insist upon taking their short ropes into too deep waters; most of us are content with living within the constraints of the ropes we weave. And not all of us weave the same. More fortunate weavers manage enough rope to navigate deeper, more exciting parts of the ocean; others find their weaving skills constrain them to shallower depths. Living amongst us are those unfortunates who want to weave, but can’t and those who are weaving as best they can, but still not able to create enough rope to tether themselves securely to sea floor. And then, there are those who insist on the right to be anchored but refuse to weave full stop—those not unable, but unwilling. All of these people come together to create a rope weaver society; diverse and beautiful, greedy and cruel—the best and worst of weaver-kind.
The truth of rope weaver society
In an ideal rope weaver society, everyone has access to the rope they need. The government collects rope from weavers who have enough and shares it amongst those who don’t. In this way, they try to ensure that everyone has rope, everyone is anchored, and everyone is safe. But there is no such thing as an ideal society. We are weavers, we are flawed, we are fearful, and we are greedy. Some who have far more rope than they’d ever need horde it and hide it—or worse yet, take rope from weavers with little rope to spare. And then, there are the unable and unwilling. It is only right that we ensure those unable to weave still have rope; as civilised weavers, it is our responsibility to weave for those who cannot weave for themselves. But, what about those unwilling to weave; do they deserve rope too? At first glance, we say NO! But, then we see the face of a child and cannot bring ourselves to sacrifice the innocent. So, we give to the unwilling, because in their care is one who is unable. And then we give to the unwilling because they claim to be unable and we do not want to err on the side of wrong. The rope weaver sacrifices a bit more rope than they can spare in the hopes that it will help another; but in reward, they are asked to sacrifice even more. And so it begins; and so it escalates—until there is no “ask”, there is only “take”.
The rope weaver’s sacrifice
Those who suffer the greatest burden in a rope-weaving society are those who can barely weave enough rope for themselves. These are the people who anchor in shallow water in the hopes that they will be okay. These are the people who toil day-in and day-out, proud to contribute, too proud to complain. These are the people who live in a constant state of fear—watching as their precious rope is taken from them and given to others—perhaps not less deserving, but certainly not more so—without thought given to what happens to the weaver themselves.
They rope weaver weaves in the hope that somehow they will find a way to weave enough to satisfy everyone. They live in hope that, as they drift without secured anchor, there will be a rock or shoal— something—on which to cling and delay the drift into open sea. They live in the knowledge that when they do slip away, there will be no one there to throw them a rope.
And so, the rope weaver drowns
In every society, there will be those who are lost; utopia is but a dream. The question I pose today is this:
“If there must be sacrifice—and we know there must be—is it right to sacrifice those whose only wish is to be allowed to weave and keep enough for themselves for those who refuse to weave full stop?”